← Back to index

Foundry MVP Path

What exists right now (today)

Working:

Not working / not yet built:

Positioning guardrails for MVP

Foundry MVP stays horizontal at the core: private/local inference ops on Apple Silicon.

The primary buyer remains the CTO / engineering lead who wants reliable local inference, reduced cloud API exposure, clear observability, and supportable deployment.

A secondary buyer path is allowed for service businesses and document-heavy operators, but only through one narrow workflow pilot. Foundry should not become a broad automation consultancy in MVP.

OpenClaw/Hermes positioning:

MVP build sequence

Step 1: Package the full stack (1 week)

Goal: A customer could run one command and get Foundry + their chosen harness + observability.

Why first: If we can't give a customer a working full stack in 5 minutes, nothing else matters. This is the proof that the product works outside our machine.

Step 2: Advisory pack (1 week, parallel with Step 1)

Goal: We can deliver the £299 advisory offer tomorrow if someone asks.

Why parallel: We can sell this before any packaging is done. If someone asks tomorrow, we deliver manually. The packaging catches up.

Step 3: Managed setup scripts (2 weeks)

Goal: A repeatable install process that turns a bare Mac Studio into a working Foundry node with the full stack.

Step 4: Remote support baseline (1 week)

Goal: We can support a customer's Mac Studio without being in the room.

Why before dashboard: We need to be able to support the first 3 customers. A fancy dashboard can wait. A way to see what's wrong on their machine can't.

Step 5: One bounded workflow pilot (optional, from Week 3+)

Goal: Prove Foundry can reduce repetitive admin workload for one service-business customer without turning MVP into broad workflow automation.

Pick one workflow only, for one customer:

MVP boundary:

Why bounded: This gives service-business buyers something concrete while keeping reusable workflow packs out of core MVP until V2.

Step 6: First 3 customers (ongoing from Step 2)

Goal: Real paying customers using the stack.

Not a build step — this runs in parallel from day 1. We start selling as soon as Step 2 is done.

What we skip in MVP

Tes-specific questions for the discussion

1. omlx vs Ollama as primary runtime for customers — omlx is more capable but less known. Do we standardise on one or support both from day 1?

2. Capacity guard test suite — the code exists but no venv/pytest is wired up. What's the path to making it testable and shippable?

3. Benchmark pack standardisation — what benchmark packs should we ship as the default evidence base for customers?

4. llm_stats → Foundry integration — llm_stats already reads Foundry data. How tight should the packaged coupling be?

5. Hardware profile scope — M3 Ultra 512GB only for MVP, or do we need M4 Mac Pro / M4 MacBook Pro profiles too?

6. omlx production readiness — is omlx stable enough to recommend as a customer's primary serving substrate, or does it need more hardening?

7. Workflow pilot safety — what minimal review/audit mechanism is enough for a service-business pilot without building a full workflow product too early?

Timeline

WeekStepDeliverable
1Package truth layer + Advisory pack`pip install llm-stats` works; advisory template ready to sell
2-3Managed setup scripts`foundry init/doctor/configure/status` works end-to-end
3-4Remote support baselineTailscale + health bundle + support runbook
3-4+Optional bounded workflow pilotOne human-reviewed admin workflow using OpenClaw/Hermes, not a reusable pack
1-4+First 3 customersSell advisory, deploy managed, collect feedback

Total: 3-4 weeks to a sellable, deployable MVP.

The core MVP is Foundry private/local inference ops. The workflow pilot is a deliberately constrained proof point for the secondary service-business buyer path.